slider_2.5.Resources-and-Infrastructure

RESOURCES & INFRASTRUCTURE

See the latest updates and learn more.

Mandate

To be the first point of contact for infrastructure and resource development in the Saugeen Ojibway Nation Traditional Territory and to work with knowledge holders, experts and technical staff to develop a consultation plan for each project.

Purpose
To protect our rights and way of life.

Projects incorporate Western and Indigenous knowledge systems for a more robust process that minimizes the impact to natural and cultural resources. The Resources and Infrastructure team works to ensure consultation is occurring at the earliest stages of development and that, where impacts cannot be avoided, appropriate accommodations are in place.

Role of the Coordinators

Infrastructure Planning Coordinator
Parks Canada
Landfills
Linear developments - natural gas, hydro corridors
Water treatment plant upgrades
Road infrastructure
Municipal works
Housing development
Dams
Public education on rights in the SON Traditional Territory
Divestiture
Land use plan reviews
Shared
Hunting and gathering in the SON Territory
Natural heritage reviews
Archeology
Territorial Resources Coordinator
Pits and quarries
Water works
Forestry
Permits to take water

Major Highlights

TP Hayes Decision
NEYAASHIINIGMIING - A new Ontario Court decision delivers a stinging rebuke of the conduct of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) and a quarry operator on the Bruce Peninsula (T and P Hayes) for failure to properly consult the Saugeen Ojibway Nation. As a result of this failure, the Court has quashed approvals for the T and P Hayes quarry project.

In the case of Saugeen First Nation and Chippewas of Nawash v. Ontario (Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry) and T & P Hayes Ltd.*, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice overturned the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry’s (MNRF) approval of T and P Hayes’ quarry licence, finding that the MNRF breached its duty to consult and accommodate the Saugeen Ojibway Nation’s Aboriginal and Treaty rights. The Court found these breaches “serious”, including the failure to notify SON of the project in a timely manner, failure by the Government to follow its own process, failure to provide funding for proper reviews of the project’s impacts, and failure to engage in a meaningful consultation with SON about the project’s impacts.

The SON Joint Chiefs and Councils are celebrating this monumental decision, “This comes after years of efforts to defend our constitutionally-protected rights in the face of hundreds of active quarries in our Territory. In this case, our efforts to defend our rights were met with years of stalling, denial of our rights, and a refusal to provide us with relevant information,” says Chief Lester Anoquot of Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation. “The Court has recognized that these tactics are not acceptable, and do not uphold the honour of the Crown or advance reconciliation. We hope this decision will serve as a road map for how to do better on the many other quarry applications currently in process.”

A key issue in the case was who should pay for SON’s technical experts to review the quarry project, in order to identify and address impacts to SON’s rights. The Court agreed with SON that the Crown should fund such technical reviews.

“These are not our projects and they don’t benefit our Communities. Our Communities should not have to take from already-scarce community funds needed for housing, education and other essential services to enable someone else’s project. We are asking to participate in consultation on a level playing field that doesn’t disadvantage us,” said Chief Greg Nadjiwon of Chippewas of Nawash First Nation.

The decision can be found at Saugeen First Nation and Chippewas of Nawash Unceded First Nation v Ontario (MNRF), 2017 ONSC 3456

Upcoming Activities

Training sessions, ex. Archeo-botany

Latest Updates from the Resources and Infrastructure File

Resources

Download resources and see our Territory map.
Read More